Best Time Tracking Software for Legal Teams 2026
Capture legal work before entries go missing. Compare time tracking, matter allocation and review controls, then hand approved entries to billing.
- Published
- Updated
Smokeball is our top time tracking software for lawyers reviewing documents across interrupted working sessions. Its AutoTime feature captures matter activity as you work and turns it into editable time entries. That helps staff recover work they would otherwise reconstruct from memory.
A manual timer gives you more direct control over each session, while mobile entry helps record work away from your desk. The choices below suit different working patterns. Each still needs a supervisor’s decision about which recorded work passes to billing.
Top Time Recording Options for Lawyers in 2026
1. Smokeball
Smokeball ranks first for document-heavy teams because AutoTime connects supported activity with the matter being worked on. Its Australian setup guide describes automatic capture alongside manual additions for work outside tracked activities. You can inspect pending entries during the day and finalise them before the overnight transfer to Smokeball Billing.
The capture method has a specific limitation. Smokeball’s AutoTime guide explains that New Outlook records a minute for each email viewing lasting at least ten seconds. Reopening the same email can produce more recorded minutes than actual reading time. For repeated document and email review, inspect the resulting duration before treating it as chargeable work.
AutoTime entries remain editable before invoicing. Changing a time entry does not change its underlying Activity record, which helps distinguish captured activity from the entry you intend to use. This is not, by itself, proof of a complete history showing every editor and previous narrative.
The Australian pricing page lists Grow from $249 per user per month excluding GST, with AutoTime purchased separately. Prosper+ includes AutoTime under custom pricing. Grow is aimed at firms with three or more staff. Assess the cost of the required plan and add-on together, including the number of licensed staff and the contract term in the firm’s quote.
2. Clio
Clio is the stronger choice when fee earners want a timer and manual entries inside a browser-based matter workflow. Clio Manage lets staff start, pause and restart a timer. Staff can also add entries directly to a matter. The mobile app also supports time entries, so a client call away from the workstation can be recorded against its matter.
Clio ranks second here because its documented timer requires a deliberate recording action. For teams comfortable with that habit, it gives a clear point to pause when another matter interrupts. Its Activities view also supports non-billable entries and corrections before billing. However, Clio’s time-entry guide warns that bulk edits do not preserve the original entry details.
Clio includes time tracking across its Australian plans, with licences priced per user and monthly or annual contract terms. Use the firm-specific Australian quote to compare the required seats and GST treatment. Core adds app integrations and two custom roles, while higher plans have unlimited custom roles. Those permission differences affect a team that wants staff to record work while supervisors control the next step.
Clio also documents CSV and PDF activity exports. A CSV includes creation and update timestamps, but those timestamps alone do not explain who changed a narrative or what it said before. Keep the correction reason with the review record when that detail is needed.
Capture the Work While the Matter is Open
Record the matter and task when work starts, then correct the entry while the session is still fresh. A timer measures an elapsed session. Manual entry records a duration you supply. Activity-assisted capture uses supported software actions to propose or create entries.
Consider an illustrative interrupted review. A solicitor spends 24 minutes examining transfers on matter A, takes a 12-minute call on matter B, then resumes matter A for 18 minutes. The actual work is 42 minutes on A and 12 minutes on B, before any agreed billing treatment.
With a timer, pause A before starting B and restart A on returning. If two timers overlap, compare the records with the call and document activity, then remove the duplicated interval. An open document throughout the call does not establish that the solicitor worked on it during those 12 minutes.
Write a description that explains the work, such as “Review transfers between supplied accounts and note unresolved recipient details”. “Review file” gives a supervisor little basis to assess the entry. Add the fee earner and the work date, keeping the matter identifier consistent with the client file.
For missing time, use contemporaneous emails or a call note to reconstruct the supported duration. Record why the entry was added late. Clio’s mobile workflow supports entries within a matter, while Smokeball’s activity setup permits manual additions for work outside its tracked activity. Both approaches still depend on selecting the correct matter.
Separate Analysis Time From Solicitor Review
Keep statement preparation, returned-analysis review and legal advice as distinct time records. The people performing those tasks may have different roles and rates. A service fee belongs in a separate expense record, without being converted into a solicitor’s hours.
FinTrace removes hours of repetitive statement handling by producing a searchable ledger and a clear findings report. Every finding identifies its source PDF filename and page, so the solicitor has the supporting evidence at hand. Forensic accountants also use the service to free time for interpretation and specialist analysis.
For a matter using FinTrace, record staff time spent assembling the supplied statements and instructions. Record the solicitor’s later work considering the returned findings separately from advice to the client. The FinTrace charge remains the external service charge.
In one FinTrace matter, work estimated at roughly 50 hours of manual lawyer review was delivered in about 10 hours. Those figures describe that matter’s estimated work and delivery. They do not determine the time recorded on another file or the fee a solicitor may charge. Record the actual work performed under the matter’s agreed charging basis.
Review Corrections and Non-Billable Work
A supervisor must distinguish work performed from work approved for charging. Review duplicate sessions and overlapping entries together, including cases where several fee earners attend the same discussion. Separate useful joint work from accidental duplication.
For administrative work, apply the firm’s treatment under the agreed basis. Keep non-billable time visible for capacity planning. If a valid work entry is written off, retain its working duration separately from the amount allowed through to billing. Deleting all evidence of that work would distort the firm’s picture of matter effort.
When correcting a narrative or duration, retain the entry identifier, previous value and replacement. Record the editor, reason and supervisor’s decision. If the software’s history does not retain those details, keep them in the approved matter review record. A general activity feed or an updated timestamp does not establish a full correction history.
In Victoria, the Legal Services Board and Commissioner’s costs guidance describes itemised information that helps clients assess reasonableness. It includes task descriptions, the person doing the work and time spent. These are useful fields to preserve before billing. A software-generated narrative does not establish that a charge is reasonable.
Pass Approved Time to Billing
Pass an approved entry forward with its stable identifier, matter, fee earner, work date, description, duration and chargeable status. Include the applicable rate and any approved adjustment. The downstream workflow needs to preserve that approval, without interpreting every captured activity as ready to charge.
Built-in billing keeps the time entry inside the same system. Smokeball documents finalisation into Smokeball Billing, while Clio Manage uses time entries in its billing workflow. Finalisation and supervisor approval are separate concepts, so name who is responsible for the latter.
A documented integration transfers data between systems under its stated mapping and permissions. A file export requires a separate import or manual handoff. Clio’s CSV export is a documented export route, not evidence that another billing system accepts every field automatically.
For either handoff, retain the approved batch and reconcile its entry count and total duration with the receiving records. Match identifiers to detect an entry imported twice. Keep rejected rows visible until corrected, then transfer only the missing entries. Matching a batch’s total alone can conceal one omission offset by one duplicate.
The legal billing software guide covers the next stage of turning approved entries into a reviewed bill. Firm-wide allocation belongs in the legal practice management software comparison.
Choose for the Firm’s Working Pattern
Choose Smokeball when supported matter activity is the main source of missing time and the team can review its automatic entries. Choose Clio when staff prefer deliberate timers and need mobile entry within a matter workflow. For an existing firm platform, the cost of changing the whole system can outweigh the benefit of replacing its timer.
For multiple fee earners, compare permissions as well as licence numbers. Staff need access to their assigned matters, and supervisors need enough visibility to review shared work. Fixed-fee matters still benefit from recorded effort for capacity and profitability planning. That internal measurement does not turn the work into an extra hourly client charge.
A standalone recorder can suit a firm keeping its existing billing system. Its cost comparison must include the time spent reconciling exports and corrections. Compare the whole licensed team over the same contract term, including GST and paid connectors, against the integrated plan that supplies the required capture method.
Use the interrupted session as a short acceptance scenario. The expected result is 42 working minutes on A and 12 on B, with each duration attributed to the right solicitor. Correct A’s narrative, retain the reason and editor, then pass its approved entry to the billing stage once. The receiving record must retain the approved matter and fee earner, with no duplicated time.
Smokeball’s documented pending-entry review and finalisation cover its side of that workflow. Clio documents timer corrections and activity exports. Make the retained correction record and reconciled handoff part of the firm’s adoption decision, alongside the capture method staff will actually use.
FinTrace
Statements in. Evidence out.
FinTrace turns your bank statements into one searchable Excel ledger and a written findings report, with every finding cited to its source page.
FinTrace
See how FinTrace works